Banana AnalyticsBANANAANALYTICS

County profile

Arroyo Municipio, Puerto Rico Community Health Profile

Environmental risk, disease burden, provider access, and SDOH scores for community health needs assessment and service line planning. Fused from EPA, CDC, CMS, and Census data into a single free view.

Opportunity Score

1Lowout of 100

Env

N/A

Disease

N/A

Provider

1

−49 vs scale midpoint

SDOH

N/A

FIPS: 72015Population: 15,573Risk overview: No multiple-score screening flag

Specific health risk patterns

Arroyo Municipio, PR: 1 specific risk pattern triggered

Each pattern below combines a specific environmental exposure with a population that is more vulnerable to that exposure. When both are present at meaningful levels in Arroyo Municipio, the pattern triggers. These are the most concrete data points for documenting a significant health need in a Community Health Needs Assessment and for planning where services or community investment would land hardest.

Internally, we call these “Compound Signals.” Each is a versioned, weighted composite scored against the national distribution. The full formula and citations live on the methodology page.

Industrial Burden· 100Very Highlow confidence

Industrial emissions exposure × Surrounding population

Defend this finding — full lineage to source data5 sources cited
Industrial Burden

Arroyo Municipio: 100/100 (elevated above the 70th-percentile threshold)

TRI facility density × PFAS contamination × pesticide use × total provider access deficit. Captures cumulative industrial environmental load on the surrounding population.

0.35 × percentile(tri_facility_count) + 0.25 × percentile(pfas_severity_score) + 0.20 × percentile(pesticide_total_kg) + 0.20 × percentile(total_provider_access_deficit)

Methodology. Combines three distinct industrial exposure modes (point-source releases, drinking-water contamination, pesticide use) with a generalist provider-access leg since industrial pollution health effects span multiple specialties. Methodology v1.8.0.

Threshold. Elevated when score ≥ 70th national percentile across all US counties evaluated for this signal

Peer set. All US counties evaluated for the signal (~3,222, less coverage gaps)

Components (4)

TRI facility count35%needs review

Number of EPA Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) reporting facilities in the county.

EPA — Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) via Envirofacts

Vintage: TRI 2023 reporting year · Refresh: Annual · Lag: 18 months

Source page →

How it's measured. Count of facilities reporting any TRI-listed chemical release in the most recent reporting year. TRI thresholds (10K-25K lb manufacturing; 500 lb persistent-bioaccumulative) mean smaller polluters are excluded from this count.

Caveat. TRI is industrial self-report. Underreporting is documented for some sectors and chemicals; the count is a floor, not a ceiling.

Coverage. All 3,222 US counties (zero-inflated; many rural counties = 0)

PFAS contamination severity score25%

Composite 0–100 severity score for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) contamination in the county's drinking water and environment.

EPA — UCMR5 (Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule) + ECHO

Vintage: UCMR5 sampling 2023–2025 · Refresh: Quarterly · Lag: 3–6 months

Source page →

How it's measured. Composite score combining detection frequency, peak concentration relative to EPA Health Advisory Levels, and number of PFAS species detected from UCMR5 public water system sampling and ECHO enforcement records.

Caveat. UCMR5 only samples public water systems serving 3,300+ people; private well users in small or rural communities are not represented.

Coverage. Counties with at least one UCMR5-eligible PWS

Total pesticide use (kg/year)20%

Total estimated agricultural pesticide use in the county for the year, in kilograms (EPest_HIGH conservative estimate).

USGS — Pesticide National Synthesis Project (PNSP)

Vintage: PNSP 2019 (preliminary; 2018 unavailable; 2020+ unreleased) · Refresh: Annual when published · Lag: 2–3 years (and the program is on medium-low update reliability)

Source page →

How it's measured. USGS PNSP estimates county-level pesticide application from USDA Census of Agriculture acreage by crop, multiplied by crop-specific application rates from proprietary surveys. EPest_HIGH is the regional-pool imputation that's conservative against undercounting.

Caveat. PNSP funding was nearly cut in 2023 and the program now publishes irregularly. 2018 has no data; 2020+ is unreleased as of methodology v1.8.0. Use with the data-quality note shown on the platform.

Coverage. 3,054 of 3,222 US counties

Total provider access deficit20%

Inverted national percentile rank of total healthcare specialists per 100K, with a 50/50 adjacency adjustment.

100 − [0.5 × percentile(total_specialists_per_100k, this county) + 0.5 × percentile(total_specialists_per_100k, neighbor counties weighted by population)]

Methodology. Same shape as the specialty-specific deficits. Used by Industrial Burden where the relevant access dimension isn't a single specialty (industrial pollution health effects span pulmonary, cardiovascular, oncologic, and developmental medicine).

Components (2)

Total healthcare specialists per 100,000 population50%needs review

All active healthcare specialists in the county, normalized to population.

CMS — NPPES — National Plan and Provider Enumeration System

Vintage: Current month · Refresh: Monthly · Lag: Same month

Source page →

How it's measured. NPPES registry — all specialty taxonomy codes — geocoded to practice address, summed per county, divided by Census population estimate.

Caveat. NPPES is registration-time data, not practice attestation.

Coverage. All 3,222 US counties

Total healthcare specialists per 100,000 populationneighbor adjustedneeds review

All active healthcare specialists in the county, normalized to population.

CMS — NPPES — National Plan and Provider Enumeration System

Vintage: Current month · Refresh: Monthly · Lag: Same month

Source page →

How it's measured. NPPES registry — all specialty taxonomy codes — geocoded to practice address, summed per county, divided by Census population estimate.

Caveat. NPPES is registration-time data, not practice attestation.

Coverage. All 3,222 US counties

4 signals evaluated. See all signal methodologies →

Where Arroyo Municipio stands

Fewer than two displayed scores reach the screening threshold

Arroyo Municipio, Puerto Rico has these published scores: Provider Gap 0.6/100. None of the published scores reach the screening threshold of 70. Missing scores: 3. Provider Gap summarizes provider supply relative to population, including the pipeline’s access adjustments. Registration counts do not establish appointment availability or whether a practice accepts a patient’s insurance. These weighted scores support screening and comparison; a score of 70 does not mean that 70% of counties have lower scores.

Methodology: when three or more of the four major health-risk areas (pollution, chronic disease, doctor access, social and economic conditions) have displayed scores of at least 70/100, we call the pattern “multi-pillar convergence.” The scoring approach and citations live on the methodology page.

Risk profile

Arroyo Municipio compared to Puerto Rico

Four scores on a 0–100 scale. Higher values indicate greater relative burden or need within each measure. The reference line at 50 marks the scale midpoint.

Arroyo Municipio four-pillar profile20406080100Disease BurdenEnv RiskSDOH compositeProvider Gap

Provider Gap (1) is at or below the scale midpoint of 50/100.

  • Arroyo Municipio
  • Puerto Rico state mean
  • Scale midpoint (50)
  • Signal threshold (70)

Current Conditions

Today's air quality, fires, and weather alerts

Live operational data for Arroyo Municipio: real-time AQI from EPA AirNow, active fires from NIFC, and any National Weather Service advisories. Updated daily.

Current Air Quality
44Good
PM2.5: 7.9 µg/m³ · 2026-10-15
Source: EPA AirNow
Nearest Active Wildfire
No nearby active fires
0 fires within 100 km · 0 within 200 km
Source: NIFC active fire perimeters

Environmental Factors

Air, water, and exposure indicators

Top environmental indicators for Arroyo Municipio with state and national benchmarks. Full profile covers 40+ metrics on the platform.

These indicators describe environmental conditions and potential exposure. They are not a complete record of environmental incidents in Arroyo Municipio and do not establish the cause of an individual illness. Check each measure's source and reporting period in the data-source reference and review the scoring methods.

IndicatorArroyo MunicipioPR avgUS avg
Traffic Proximity
EJSCREEN
297,547
index
▼ -38% vs PR
477,197291,320
Superfund Proximity
EPA EJSCREEN
0.10
score
▼ -68% vs PR
0.310.16

PFAS in sampled water systems

EPA UCMR5 observations for systems associated with these counties through reported service ZIP codes. These results are displayed separately and do not contribute to the Environmental Risk score.

Loading sampled-system observations…

How Superfund proximity contributes

The 2024 EJSCREEN proximity indicator is 0.0963. It uses distances to proposed/final National Priorities List and Superfund Alternative Approach sites within 10 km. This is proximity context, not a measurement of heavy-metal exposure or illness.

Superfund proximity alone is insufficient to assign a composite environmental score.

Component weights, scaling and limitations

Vulnerable Medicare Population

Who needs the grid to stay alive

Medicare beneficiaries in Arroyo Municipio who depend on electricity for dialysis, oxygen, or other powered medical equipment. From the HHS emPOWER program, which CMS publishes monthly so emergency managers know who to find first when the power goes out.

PopulationCountPer 1,000 Medicare
Total Medicare beneficiaries
Denominator
4,340—
Electricity-dependent (any DME)
Ventilators, oxygen concentrators, IV pumps, motorized wheelchairs
234
53.9
▲ +4.2% vs PR
Dialysis-dependent
ESRD beneficiaries needing in-center or home dialysis
12
2.76
▲ +24% vs PR
Oxygen-dependent
Home oxygen concentrators (outage-vulnerable)
31
7.1
▲ +47% vs PR

Source: HHS emPOWER Map (ArcGIS county layer), October 2026. Counts of 1–10 are masked as “≤10” per HHS privacy rules; per-1,000 rates are derived and still respect the privacy floor. Full methodology →

Provider Supply

Specialty physician density per 100,000 residents

Active providers in Arroyo Municipio from the CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Compared to the U.S. average for each specialty. Adjacency adjustment is applied separately in the Provider Gap pillar score.

SpecialtyArroyo MunicipioUS avg
Primary Care
Family medicine, internal medicine, general practice, pediatrics.
211.9
per 100k
▲ +62% vs US
130.4
Cardiology
Cardiovascular disease, electrophysiology, interventional cardiology.
12.8
per 100k
▲ +6.4% vs US
12.1
Pulmonology
Respiratory disease specialists — relevant to PM2.5 and wildfire smoke exposure.
6.4
per 100k
▲ +6.4% vs US
6.0
Psychiatry
Mental health prescribers; complements behavioral health access.
19.3
per 100k
▲ +3.1% vs US
18.7
Oncology / Hematology
Cancer specialists.
6.4
per 100k
+0.2% vs US
6.4
Neurology
Neurological disease specialists.
6.4
per 100k
▼ -19% vs US
7.9

Source: CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Counts reflect providers with a primary practice address in Arroyo Municipio; specialty is taken from the provider's primary NUCC taxonomy code.

Pro analytical view

What drives this county's scores

The flagged signals and service-line opportunities for Arroyo Municipio, plus the methodology decomposition behind each score. Visible to Pro, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise tiers.

Where to focus

Pro feature

Top flagged signals + service lines are a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

Score decomposition

Each named signal's component breakdown with weights. The bar length is the component's percentile rank; the parenthetical is its weight in the final blend.

Pro feature

Score decomposition is a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

Tract drill-down

Census tracts inside Arroyo Municipio

Pro feature

Tract-level drill-down is a Pro feature

See how each signal's components blend into its final score, and which signals + service lines this county should prioritize. Available on Professional, Consultant Studio, and Enterprise.

On the full platform

What else is available for Arroyo Municipio

The page above is a subset. The free Community account unlocks the full single-county profile: every indicator, every data source, demographics, historical trends, and mortality data. Professional unlocks multi-county comparison, compound signal analysis, service line rankings, and consultant-ready PDF reports.

Full Environmental Profile

All 40+ environmental metrics including toxic releases, hazardous site proximity, PFAS detection, pesticide exposure, and climate stress indicators.

Service Line Opportunities

See how Arroyo Municipio ranks for respiratory, oncology, cardiovascular, renal, endocrine, and behavioral health service line opportunity.

Multi-County Comparison

Compare Arroyo Municipio side-by-side with neighboring counties across every dimension.

Trend Analysis

5-year sparklines for health outcomes, SDOH measures, and mortality rates so you can see where the county is heading, not just where it is today.

PDF Report Export

Generate a consultant-ready environmental health briefing for Arroyo Municipio with methodology citations. Drops straight into a CHNA or grant application.

See pricing →

Nearby Counties

Counties bordering Arroyo Municipio

Adjacent county profiles with their own scores and environmental health data. Source: Census Bureau County Adjacency File.

Deeper reads from our research that connect to the data on this page.

Data sources: EPA AQS, EPA EJSCREEN, EPA TRI, CDC PLACES, CDC WONDER, CMS NPPES, Census ACS, County Health Rankings, NOAA ACIS, NCI State Cancer Profiles. Every score on this page is derived from publicly available federal data, fused by the Banana Analytics pipeline.

Methodology: See the full scoring methodology (v1.2.0) for weights, sensitivity analysis, and validation against county-level mortality data.

Last refreshed: October 9, 2026